Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Home
Help
Search
Calendar
Login
Register
ATV Florida Forum
>
General
>
Open Discussion
>
Obama for what? NOT!
Pages:
1
[
2
]
3
Go Down
« previous
next »
Print
Author
Topic: Obama for what? NOT! (Read 20971 times)
AintSkeered
Contributing Member Plus
Supreme Member
Offline
Location: Sunrise, FL
Posts: 2090
Re: Obama for what? NOT!
«
Reply #25 on:
September 10, 2008, 09:34:58 PM »
McCain proclaimed himself a maverick only after finally realizing that millions of voters wanted real change, yet, voted with GW over 90% of the time.
http://www.barackobama.com/issues/
«
Last Edit: September 11, 2008, 09:31:36 AM by AintSkeered
»
Logged
2015 Can-Am Outlander XT-P by Perry Performance Group
gtnwood
Senior Member
Offline
Location: Omnipresence
Posts: 367
Re: Obama for what? NOT!
«
Reply #26 on:
September 11, 2008, 03:52:34 PM »
Quote from: quadracer1992 on September 10, 2008, 09:05:12 PM
Quote from: fkoney on September 08, 2008, 09:25:42 PM
Subject: Obama explains National Anthem
Hot on the heels of his explanation for why he no longer wears a flag pin, presidential candidate Senator Barack Obama was forced to explain why he doesn't follow protocol when the National Anthem is played.
According to the United States Code, Title 36, Chapter 10, Sec. 171, During rendition of the national anthem when the flag is displayed, all present except those in uniform are expected to stand at attention facing the flag with the right hand over the heart.
'As I've said about the flag pin, I don't want to be perceived as taking sides,' Obama said. 'There are a lot of people in the world to whom the American flag is a symbol of oppression. And the anthem itself conveys a war-like message. You know, the bombs bursting in air and all. It should be swapped for something less parochial and less bellicose. I like the song 'I'd Like to Teach the World to Sing.' If that were our anthem, then I might salute it.'
WHAAAAAAAT!!!!!!!!!! Yes, ladies and gentlemen, this could possibly be our next president. I, for once, am speechless.
He better take sides..........if he is not on the side of AMERICA he MUST NOT EVEN BE CONSIDERED for the office he is seeking. We do not need a man in office that will not salute the flag. The world knows how to sing, what they need to know is that the USA will defend what that flag stands for.
Pass It On Before It's To Late.
Let's Teach All of America About This Idiot.
Logically what Obama said makes perfect sence. The anthem does convey a kind of war like message, so I can see why he thinks that way. He wants other countries to like Americans, so mabe by us not being so full of ourselves and flaunting flags all over the place like were the best, other countries might like us more.
Thats probably the number 1 rerason we are the number 1 nation in the world, and you dont think so GTFO
Logged
'Political Correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and
rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition
that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.'
(From a Texas A&M student)
2005 Kodiak 450, 26" 589s
oncewaslost
Guest
Re: Obama for what? NOT!
«
Reply #27 on:
September 11, 2008, 04:22:02 PM »
Quote from: AintSkeered on September 10, 2008, 09:34:58 PM
McCain proclaimed himself a maverick only after finally realizing that millions of voters wanted real change, yet, voted with GW over 90% of the time.
http://www.barackobama.com/issues/
Aty least he voted...ha ha ha whooo!!!
Obama Trys to Have It Both Ways By Avoiding Votes
Email|Link Posted by Jan McElroy December 22, 2007 02:57 PM
In the December 22 Concord Monitor , it stated that Barack Obama seeks to find common ground, but from his record it looks more like fence straddling to me. He skipped the tough vote on Iran and then distorted what the bill authorized and criticized those who voted for it (including his mentor thingy Durbin, IL-D.) He never had to vote on the Iraq war as a sworn in U.S. Senator pledged to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States of America. A Senator's oath places quite a different set of responsibilities on its bearers from those borne by a private citizen, and yet he acts as if they were equivalent. They certainly are not, and acting as if they are, does him no credit in my view, even though I also was strongly opposed to the invasion of Iraq from the beginning.
Obama has a history of dodging commitments on tough votes. In a New York Times article on December 20, Raymond Hernandez and Christopher Drew report that Obama's often voted just "present" in the Illinois Senate. They write:
"In 1999, Barack Obama was faced with a difficult vote in the Illinois legislature — to support a bill that would let some juveniles be tried as adults, a position that risked drawing fire from African-Americans, or to oppose it, possibly undermining his image as a tough-on-crime moderate. In the end, Mr. Obama chose neither to vote for nor against the bill. He voted “present,” effectively sidestepping the issue, an option he invoked nearly 130 times as a state senator."
He, of course, can give all sorts of reasons why he would just vote "present" and not "for" or "against", and this doesn't include the votes taken when he wasn't even "present" during his years in the state senate. This isn't seeking common ground. Obama is trying to have it both ways by avoiding recorded votes on tough issues for which he would be answerable. Where is the strong leadership in this?
Logged
quadracer1992
Supreme Member
Offline
Location: West Palm Beach, Fl.
Posts: 1254
***Anthony*** **FF+J Racing**
Re: Obama for what? NOT!
«
Reply #28 on:
September 11, 2008, 11:00:30 PM »
Quote from: gtnwood on September 11, 2008, 03:52:34 PM
Quote from: quadracer1992 on September 10, 2008, 09:05:12 PM
Quote from: fkoney on September 08, 2008, 09:25:42 PM
Subject: Obama explains National Anthem
Hot on the heels of his explanation for why he no longer wears a flag pin, presidential candidate Senator Barack Obama was forced to explain why he doesn't follow protocol when the National Anthem is played.
According to the United States Code, Title 36, Chapter 10, Sec. 171, During rendition of the national anthem when the flag is displayed, all present except those in uniform are expected to stand at attention facing the flag with the right hand over the heart.
'As I've said about the flag pin, I don't want to be perceived as taking sides,' Obama said. 'There are a lot of people in the world to whom the American flag is a symbol of oppression. And the anthem itself conveys a war-like message. You know, the bombs bursting in air and all. It should be swapped for something less parochial and less bellicose. I like the song 'I'd Like to Teach the World to Sing.' If that were our anthem, then I might salute it.'
WHAAAAAAAT!!!!!!!!!! Yes, ladies and gentlemen, this could possibly be our next president. I, for once, am speechless.
He better take sides..........if he is not on the side of AMERICA he MUST NOT EVEN BE CONSIDERED for the office he is seeking. We do not need a man in office that will not salute the flag. The world knows how to sing, what they need to know is that the USA will defend what that flag stands for.
Pass It On Before It's To Late.
Let's Teach All of America About This Idiot.
Logically what Obama said makes perfect sence. The anthem does convey a kind of war like message, so I can see why he thinks that way. He wants other countries to like Americans, so mabe by us not being so full of ourselves and flaunting flags all over the place like were the best, other countries might like us more.
Thats probably the number 1 rerason we are the number 1 nation in the world, and you dont think so GTFO
Basically we are a mix of every other nation in the world so I guess that would make it the best. But you never hear of Canada having any problems like the U.S.
Logged
~~~FF+J RACING~~~
FRANK#25 - HONDA 450R
FRED#192 - HONDA 450R
FRANKIE#13 - SUZUKI 400
JOSEPH#92 - HONDA 450R
ANTHONY#527 - SUZUKI 400
KELLI#415-YAMAHA RAPTOR700R
~~~SPONSORED BY MY DAD ~~~
cheropride
Supreme Member
Offline
Location: Oakland Park
Posts: 1270
Re: Obama for what? NOT!
«
Reply #29 on:
September 12, 2008, 04:45:30 PM »
Quote from: oncewaslost on September 11, 2008, 04:22:02 PM
Quote from: AintSkeered on September 10, 2008, 09:34:58 PM
McCain proclaimed himself a maverick only after finally realizing that millions of voters wanted real change, yet, voted with GW over 90% of the time.
http://www.barackobama.com/issues/
Aty least he voted...ha ha ha whooo!!!
Obama Trys to Have It Both Ways By Avoiding Votes
Email|Link Posted by Jan McElroy December 22, 2007 02:57 PM
In the December 22 Concord Monitor , it stated that Barack Obama seeks to find common ground, but from his record it looks more like fence straddling to me. He skipped the tough vote on Iran and then distorted what the bill authorized and criticized those who voted for it (including his mentor thingy Durbin, IL-D.) He never had to vote on the Iraq war as a sworn in U.S. Senator pledged to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States of America. A Senator's oath places quite a different set of responsibilities on its bearers from those borne by a private citizen, and yet he acts as if they were equivalent. They certainly are not, and acting as if they are, does him no credit in my view, even though I also was strongly opposed to the invasion of Iraq from the beginning.
Obama has a history of dodging commitments on tough votes. In a New York Times article on December 20, Raymond Hernandez and Christopher Drew report that Obama's often voted just "present" in the Illinois Senate. They write:
"In 1999, Barack Obama was faced with a difficult vote in the Illinois legislature — to support a bill that would let some juveniles be tried as adults, a position that risked drawing fire from African-Americans, or to oppose it, possibly undermining his image as a tough-on-crime moderate. In the end, Mr. Obama chose neither to vote for nor against the bill. He voted “present,” effectively sidestepping the issue, an option he invoked nearly 130 times as a state senator."
He, of course, can give all sorts of reasons why he would just vote "present" and not "for" or "against", and this doesn't include the votes taken when he wasn't even "present" during his years in the state senate. This isn't seeking common ground. Obama is trying to have it both ways by avoiding recorded votes on tough issues for which he would be answerable. Where is the strong leadership in this?
Okay, I am likin you already.....
Can't be all bad, in my opinion....
Logged
Kawi-360 4WD/Camo
Honda 400
Polaris Ranger 700XP
big-daddy
Defender of the secret society!
Supreme Member
Offline
Location: Miami
Posts: 5822
Home of the Brave
Re: Obama for what? NOT!
«
Reply #30 on:
September 14, 2008, 03:18:28 PM »
Obama admitted that during high school he used marijuana, cocaine, and alcohol.... WTF?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama
Logged
I wonder if we can get Cheney to take Obama hunting?
1985 CJ7 Swamp Buggy named Swamp Thing
2001 Yamaha Wolverine 4x4
2005 Kodiak 450 4x4
2007 F150 Super Crew FX4
Proud RR and FMR member
NRA Life Time member
cheropride
Supreme Member
Offline
Location: Oakland Park
Posts: 1270
Re: Obama for what? NOT!
«
Reply #31 on:
September 14, 2008, 03:37:07 PM »
Quote from: big-daddy on September 14, 2008, 03:18:28 PM
Obama admitted that during high school he used marijuana, cocaine, and alcohol.... WTF?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama
Well now, that explains alot.....
Logged
Kawi-360 4WD/Camo
Honda 400
Polaris Ranger 700XP
apkkfx400
Senior Member
Offline
Location: Apopka, FL
Posts: 492
Re: Obama for what? NOT!
«
Reply #32 on:
September 15, 2008, 08:47:07 AM »
Quote from: big-daddy on September 14, 2008, 03:18:28 PM
Obama admitted that during high school he used marijuana, cocaine, and alcohol.... WTF?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama
marijuana, cocaine AND alcohol---a teenager/highschool student experimenting with drugs-don't say it's true!!
Logged
AintSkeered
Contributing Member Plus
Supreme Member
Offline
Location: Sunrise, FL
Posts: 2090
Re: Obama for what? NOT!
«
Reply #33 on:
September 15, 2008, 09:18:19 AM »
OMG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I hope he didn't also "lust in his heart" or think inpure thoughts at any time.
Logged
2015 Can-Am Outlander XT-P by Perry Performance Group
yunt2ride
Supreme Member
Offline
Location: At the computer
Posts: 2891
Re: Obama for what? NOT!
«
Reply #34 on:
September 15, 2008, 02:09:39 PM »
Quote from: apkkfx400 on September 15, 2008, 08:47:07 AM
Quote from: big-daddy on September 14, 2008, 03:18:28 PM
Obama admitted that during high school he used marijuana, cocaine, and alcohol.... WTF?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama
marijuana, cocaine AND alcohol---a teenager/highschool student experimenting with drugs-don't say it's true!!
Does that make it ok. Lets see, it must have been peer pressure huh. Wonder how peer pressure (or threats) will play a part when those campaign funders from overseas, gets with him when they get him elected.
Logged
1997 Chevrolet 4WD extended cab
2005 Polaris 500HO 4X4 Hunter Edition Camo
AintSkeered
Contributing Member Plus
Supreme Member
Offline
Location: Sunrise, FL
Posts: 2090
Re: Obama for what? NOT!
«
Reply #35 on:
September 15, 2008, 06:42:12 PM »
Today's latest gem from McCain was, "The economy is fundamentally sound". Get your head out yer arse, please. The rest of us don't own 7 homes.
Logged
2015 Can-Am Outlander XT-P by Perry Performance Group
trx#9
Supreme Member
Offline
Location: NewMembers Girlfriend pleaser!
Posts: 3345
Manager at Seaman's Sausage House and Adult Movies
Re: Obama for what? NOT!
«
Reply #36 on:
September 15, 2008, 07:11:57 PM »
Quote from: AintSkeered on September 15, 2008, 06:42:12 PM
Today's latest gem from McCain was, "The economy is fundamentally sound". Get your head out yer arse, please. The rest of us don't own 7 homes.
Wrong, he has 9 homes.
Logged
"A SPECIAL THANKS TO MY SPONSORS"
Big Knob racing!, NewMembers Mom!
Sacks Gloryhole at the Little Bar!
Qawd32 Colon massage inc.!
Fuzzy Pickle race team!
renmus
Supreme Member
Offline
Location: e|U
Posts: 2165
I am a Florida Mudrider
Re: Obama for what? NOT!
«
Reply #37 on:
September 15, 2008, 07:37:30 PM »
slum landlord??
Logged
apkkfx400
Senior Member
Offline
Location: Apopka, FL
Posts: 492
Re: Obama for what? NOT!
«
Reply #38 on:
September 15, 2008, 08:01:53 PM »
Quote from: yunt2ride on September 15, 2008, 02:09:39 PM
Quote from: apkkfx400 on September 15, 2008, 08:47:07 AM
Quote from: big-daddy on September 14, 2008, 03:18:28 PM
Obama admitted that during high school he used marijuana, cocaine, and alcohol.... WTF?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama
marijuana, cocaine AND alcohol---a teenager/highschool student experimenting with drugs-don't say it's true!!
Does that make it ok. Lets see, it must have been peer pressure huh. Wonder how peer pressure (or threats) will play a part when those campaign funders from overseas, gets with him when they get him elected.
Doesn't make it right, but, our current president has also admitted to using cocaine in college and I'm sure alcohol was also used and one usually doesn't skip marijuana before being introduced to coke. Admitting to mistakes and learning lessons in life is only proving that one is human. If one claims to be perfect-dig deeper.
Logged
CABLEGUY1
Supreme Member
Offline
Location: E|U
Posts: 1510
Finally, ATVFlorida.com is here!
Re: Obama for what? NOT!
«
Reply #39 on:
September 16, 2008, 08:44:40 PM »
Quote from: AintSkeered on September 15, 2008, 06:42:12 PM
Today's latest gem from McCain was, "The economy is fundamentally sound". Get your head out yer arse, please. The rest of us don't own 7 homes.
Why keep faulting the man for owning several homes? If anything one should be envious.If he was able to manage his money well enough to purchase real estate than good for him. If his money was tied up in stocks or bonds instead of owning houses nothing would be said about it. Dont be hatin. It seems that he would have to be financially wise to achieve that which should be to his credit. AintSkeered if that's the best you have today you may finally be coming to the realization that Osama is losing ground. I'm still stoked about the whole Sarah Palin deal.Talk about pulling a rabbit out of a hat. You just know Bill Clinton is thinking about flavored cigars.
Logged
AintSkeered
Contributing Member Plus
Supreme Member
Offline
Location: Sunrise, FL
Posts: 2090
Re: Obama for what? NOT!
«
Reply #40 on:
September 17, 2008, 07:13:53 AM »
Keep your head in the sand and it'll all just get better, right? LOL
Logged
2015 Can-Am Outlander XT-P by Perry Performance Group
oncewaslost
Guest
Re: Obama for what? NOT!
«
Reply #41 on:
September 17, 2008, 08:01:11 AM »
Quote from: AintSkeered on September 17, 2008, 07:13:53 AM
Keep your head in the sand and it'll all just get better, right? LOL
you keeps yours there
McCain family owns 8 properties
By KENNETH P. VOGEL | 8/21/08 4:39 PM EST Text Size:
John McCain's family owns at least eight properties — not the seven Democrats are alleging or the four McCain's staff identified — according to a Politico analysis of property and tax records, as well as interviews.
John McCain's family owns at least eight properties — not the seven Democrats are alleging or the four McCain's staff identified — according to a Politico analysis of property and tax records, as well as interviews.
The presumptive Republican nominee, though, may have some wiggle room in explaining why he couldn't immediately provide an answer when asked by Politico how many houses he and his wife, Cindy, own. Sen. McCain himself does not own any of the properties. They're all owned by Cindy McCain, her dependent children and the trusts and companies they control.
Brian Rogers, a McCain spokesman, did not question Politico's analysis, but said his boss's bungling of the how-many-homes question is a nonissue.
"Voters care a lot more about candidates' personal ethics than about how many houses or residences or doghouses that John and Cindy McCain own," he said. He questioned efforts by McCain's Democratic rival, Barack Obama, to exploit the issue, given that Obama benefited from a 2005 land deal with the wife of convicted Chicago businessman — and former Obama fundraiser — Tony Rezko that expanded the Obama family's newly purchased $1.65 million homestead.
"
The reality is that Barack Obama purchased his million-dollar mansion in a shady deal involving a convicted felon, and it raises questions about his ethics and judgment," said Rogers.
Politico's analysis of the McCain records found that five of the eight properties were purchased between the summer of 2004 and this February, for a total of $11 million. And the analysis found that the McCains hired additional household help in 2007.
The five new properties are all condominiums, and they include three in Phoenix — one of which became the couple's primary Phoenix residence after a Cindy McCain family trust in 2006 sold for $3.2 million the house in which they raised their children — and a pair outside San Diego.
The new properties joined three previously owned by Cindy McCain, her dependent children and their trusts: a scenic ranch outside Sedona, Ariz., where John McCain has entertained staff, prospective running mates and political reporters; a three-bedroom Arlington, Va., condo that's been John McCain's Washington-area residence since 1993; a La Jolla, Calif. condo that is home to Cindy McCain's elderly aunt and on which the trust recently paid nearly $7,000 in back taxes.
The condo that serves as the McCain's primary Phoenix residence was purchased in 2006 for $4.7 million by Cindy McCain's trust. It is a 6,600-square foot unit.
See Also
Group plays Ayers attack
Poll: Majority wants church out of politics
McCain sparks water rights blowup
Politico's guide to the conventions
Less than one year after the McCains acquired it, a corporation controlled by Cindy McCain bought another condo on a lower floor in the same building for $830,000.
And, in between, the corporation plunked down $700,000 for a 1,900-square-foot, three-bedroom loft condo for their then-22-year-old daughter, Meghan, who was moving back to Phoenix after graduating from New York's Columbia University. The unit is now listed for sale at $730,000.
Cindy McCain, through another family corporation, spent about $4.7 million in 2004 and 2008 on two condos in an exclusive building in Coronado, Calif., an affluent San Diego suburb noted for its high percentage of military retirees.
In an interview with Cindy McCain in the June issue of Vogue magazine, conducted from the newer Coronado condo, she explained that her husband, a Navy veteran, initially wasn't keen on the idea of a pied-ŕ-terre in Coronado.
"When I bought the first one, my husband, who is not a beach person, said, 'Oh this is such a waste of money; the kids will never go,'" she said in Vogue. "Then it got to the point where they used it so much I couldn't get in the place. So I bought another one."
A McCain campaign aide who did not want to be identified discussing the McCain's personal finances, told Politico this summer that — other than the primary Phoenix residence — the new condos were "purchased for investment and are available for personal use by the McCain family."
The McCains increased their budget for household employees from $184,000 in 2006 to $273,000 in 2007, according to John McCain's tax returns.
The additional cash supports an "increase in the number of employees," the McCain aide told Politico. The aide did not answer a question about whether the growing staff stemmed from addition of new properties to the family's real estate portfolio.
Logged
big-daddy
Defender of the secret society!
Supreme Member
Offline
Location: Miami
Posts: 5822
Home of the Brave
Re: Obama for what? NOT!
«
Reply #42 on:
September 17, 2008, 04:01:40 PM »
from the horses mouth
http://www.atlah.org/broadcast/ndnr09-03-08.html
Logged
I wonder if we can get Cheney to take Obama hunting?
1985 CJ7 Swamp Buggy named Swamp Thing
2001 Yamaha Wolverine 4x4
2005 Kodiak 450 4x4
2007 F150 Super Crew FX4
Proud RR and FMR member
NRA Life Time member
CABLEGUY1
Supreme Member
Offline
Location: E|U
Posts: 1510
Finally, ATVFlorida.com is here!
Re: Obama for what? NOT!
«
Reply #43 on:
September 17, 2008, 06:23:15 PM »
BD,that made my day.That's got to be the funniest thing I've seen in a while.Especially the end when he gets on a roll.LMAO.
Logged
big-daddy
Defender of the secret society!
Supreme Member
Offline
Location: Miami
Posts: 5822
Home of the Brave
Re: Obama for what? NOT!
«
Reply #44 on:
September 17, 2008, 06:49:08 PM »
the boy can talk up a storm.
Logged
I wonder if we can get Cheney to take Obama hunting?
1985 CJ7 Swamp Buggy named Swamp Thing
2001 Yamaha Wolverine 4x4
2005 Kodiak 450 4x4
2007 F150 Super Crew FX4
Proud RR and FMR member
NRA Life Time member
cheropride
Supreme Member
Offline
Location: Oakland Park
Posts: 1270
Re: Obama for what? NOT!
«
Reply #45 on:
September 17, 2008, 07:42:43 PM »
I tell you what, when I started watching it, I thought it was really going in another direction.... That boy is a role.... He's Mama told him... Post this up... to funny, that man is on a role.... It sure was not what I was expecting though... Good find BigDaddy.... That just sounds funny.... Obama's mama.... too funny.... What a trip...
Logged
Kawi-360 4WD/Camo
Honda 400
Polaris Ranger 700XP
renmus
Supreme Member
Offline
Location: e|U
Posts: 2165
I am a Florida Mudrider
Re: Obama for what? NOT!
«
Reply #46 on:
September 17, 2008, 07:44:13 PM »
She was trash!
That man wore my ears slap out after 4 minutes or so. He made some logical points, that is for sure!
Logged
jujulo700R
Full Member
Offline
Location: Wesley Chapel
Posts: 148
When my clutch pops, my front wheels will hop!
Re: Obama for what? NOT!
«
Reply #47 on:
September 17, 2008, 09:33:37 PM »
This is actually one of the most ignorant and ridiculous segments I have seen in a long time. Nobody that talks with that much hatred and disrespect is a man of God. Obama told the media that Palin’s family was off limits so why is he attacking Obama’s family with such despicable and insulting language. This so called “reverend” has already been written off in society as a complete imbecile. The thing that gets me most is that some people seem to think it is funny, but honestly, how would you feel if someone said these cruel things about your own family. Not so funny then.
Logged
Just a little fast and just a little furious.
big-daddy
Defender of the secret society!
Supreme Member
Offline
Location: Miami
Posts: 5822
Home of the Brave
Re: Obama for what? NOT!
«
Reply #48 on:
September 18, 2008, 06:43:34 AM »
Take a Chill pill their buddy......... that was funny! And my MAMA told me too she TRASH.
Logged
I wonder if we can get Cheney to take Obama hunting?
1985 CJ7 Swamp Buggy named Swamp Thing
2001 Yamaha Wolverine 4x4
2005 Kodiak 450 4x4
2007 F150 Super Crew FX4
Proud RR and FMR member
NRA Life Time member
AintSkeered
Contributing Member Plus
Supreme Member
Offline
Location: Sunrise, FL
Posts: 2090
Re: Obama for what? NOT!
«
Reply #49 on:
September 18, 2008, 06:44:23 AM »
It's just another very desperate attempt to dispel the hope and optimism Obama brings to the campaign. On a more important note, this morning, the Repubes backed-off on calling the economy "fundamentally sound" and are now calling it "resilient". That's their version of hope and optimism! Don't have to fix it, if it ain't broke is the plan?
«
Last Edit: September 18, 2008, 07:08:37 AM by AintSkeered
»
Logged
2015 Can-Am Outlander XT-P by Perry Performance Group
Pages:
1
[
2
]
3
Go Up
Print
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Classifieds
-----------------------------
=> For Sale / Wanted
-----------------------------
General
-----------------------------
=> Open Discussion
=> Group Rides & Events
=> Where to Ride?
=> Photo Gallery & Videos
=> Tech Corner
=> Racing Scene
=> Product and Services Reviews
=> ATV Activist
Loading...