ATV Florida Forum

General => Open Discussion => Topic started by: Round Man on July 15, 2006, 04:46:05 PM



Title: The Dark Sucker Theory
Post by: Round Man on July 15, 2006, 04:46:05 PM

For years, it has been believed that electric bulbs emit light, but recent information has proved otherwise. Electric bulbs don't emit light; they suck dark. Thus, we call these bulbs Dark Suckers. The Dark Sucker Theory and the existence of dark suckers prove that dark has mass and is heavier than light.
First, the basis of the Dark Sucker Theory is that electric bulbs suck dark. For example, take the Dark Sucker in the room you are in. There is much less dark right next to it than there is elsewhere. The larger the Dark Sucker, the greater its capacity to suck dark. Dark Suckers in the parking lot have a much greater capacity to suck dark than the ones in this room.

So with all things, Dark Suckers don't last forever. Once they are full of dark, they can no longer suck. This is proven by the dark spot on a full Dark Sucker.

A candle is a primitive Dark Sucker. A new candle has a white wick. You can see that after the first use, the wick turns black, representing all the dark that has been sucked into it. If you put a pencil next to the wick of an operating candle, it will turn black. This is because it got in the way of the dark flowing into the candle. One of the disadvantages of these primitive Dark Suckers is their limited range.

There are also portable Dark Suckers. In these, the bulbs can't handle all the dark by themselves and must be aided by a Dark Storage Unit. When the Dark Storage Unit is full, it must be either emptied or replaced before the portable Dark Sucker can operate again.

Dark has mass. When dark goes into a Dark Sucker, friction from the mass generates heat. Thus, it is not wise to touch an operating Dark Sucker. Candles present a special problem as the mass must travel into a solid wick instead of through clear glass. This generates a great amount of heat and therefore it's not wise to touch an operating candle.

Also, dark is heavier than light. If you were to swim just below the surface of the lake, you would see a lot of light. If you were to slowly swim deeper and deeper, you would notice it getting darker and darker. When you get really deep, you would be in total darkness. This is because the heavier dark sinks to the bottom of the lake and the lighter light floats at the top. The is why it is called light.

Finally, we must prove that dark is faster than light. If you were to stand in a lit room in front of a closed, dark closet, and slowly opened the closet door, you would see the light slowly enter the closet. But since dark is so fast, you would not be able to see the dark leave the closet.

Next time you see an electric bulb, remember that it is a Dark Sucker. ........ ;)



Title: Re: The Dark Sucker Theory
Post by: MachineDog on July 15, 2006, 06:19:26 PM
LMAO Actually, the truth is light has mass. That's why you can't see a black hole, it sucks the light in before it can escape. Light is amazing cause if you look at the night sky most of the stuff you're seeing is millions of years older than the light reaching you because of the shear distance.


Title: Re: The Dark Sucker Theory
Post by: eldiablo64 on July 16, 2006, 07:33:23 AM
lmao theres alot of dark suckers on 34th street in st.pete especially on the south side.oh oops wrong kind of dark sucker lmao


Title: Re: The Dark Sucker Theory
Post by: UncleRico on July 16, 2006, 10:17:15 AM
I think Roberge' summed it up best with his complex number theory equation on the physical properties of lumens per foot:

X to the nth degree of the nuclear co-efficient divided by the mass minus the y (mass*volume/time) all divided by 1.7312212 + p.

Of course, you probably already know this, but I figured I'd remind you guys about it.


Title: Re: The Dark Sucker Theory
Post by: Round Man on July 16, 2006, 12:58:51 PM
I think Roberge' summed it up best with his complex number theory equation on the physical properties of lumens per foot:

X to the nth degree of the nuclear co-efficient divided by the mass minus the y (mass*volume/time) all divided by 1.7312212 + p.

Of course, you probably already know this, but I figured I'd remind you guys about it.



Thanks UncleRico
I almost forgot about that...........LOL! :Wacko.gif


Title: Re: The Dark Sucker Theory
Post by: 4fittyr on July 16, 2006, 02:35:53 PM
e=mc2  u einstien genius


Title: Re: The Dark Sucker Theory
Post by: foreman1 on July 16, 2006, 10:52:22 PM
Wow man ......
Thats some deep stuff .....
This changes everything ,is the world really round ?
 ???


Title: Re: The Dark Sucker Theory
Post by: gery350 on July 17, 2006, 03:31:06 PM
dont get me started on air conditioning.

ya'll know theres no such thing as cooling.........right. ;D ;D


Title: Re: The Dark Sucker Theory
Post by: klutchbuster400 on July 17, 2006, 03:38:14 PM
dont get me started on air conditioning.

ya'll know theres no such thing as cooling.........right. ;D ;D
I thought it was called heat stealing ::)


Title: Re: The Dark Sucker Theory
Post by: gery350 on July 17, 2006, 03:39:21 PM
close but no cigar............ ;D


Title: Re: The Dark Sucker Theory
Post by: UncleRico on July 17, 2006, 05:38:48 PM
This is almost as ignorant as people who believe in this mythical "Global Warming".

Ask any penguin, they'll learn ya about how it's a manufactured conspiracy by Ikea to bring back ice cube trays onto the market.


Did I ever tell you guys about how it was the Phone Company who shot Kennedy?










Title: Re: The Dark Sucker Theory
Post by: bluesman on July 18, 2006, 04:52:46 PM
AC IS !!!! LACK OF HEAT!!!HMMMM GOT YA 


Title: Re: The Dark Sucker Theory
Post by: Round Man on July 19, 2006, 06:20:44 PM
Like a Heat Sucker............LOL!!!!! :R


Title: Re: The Dark Sucker Theory
Post by: MadMudder on July 20, 2006, 02:21:22 PM
Then how do yall explain the sun? :-\ ???


Title: Re: The Dark Sucker Theory
Post by: klutchbuster400 on July 20, 2006, 02:41:29 PM
Then how do yall explain the sun? :-\ ???
A cold  grabber ;D