ATV Florida Forum

General => Open Discussion => Topic started by: Nos Prairie on January 13, 2005, 06:08:52 AM



Title: Polaris gets fined
Post by: Nos Prairie on January 13, 2005, 06:08:52 AM
? Did anyone ketch this in the news, govt fines polaris 1 millon dollars for defective ATVS.


Title: Re: Polaris gets fined
Post by: ripraff on January 13, 2005, 08:22:08 AM
didnt see it buyt would be interested in finding out which ones and whats wrong with them.


Title: Re: Polaris gets fined
Post by: GreggT on January 13, 2005, 08:44:09 AM
I thought Poloaris had some multi million $$ deal to provide ATV's to the military. Maybe it had something to do with that?


Title: Re: Polaris gets fined
Post by: ripraff on January 13, 2005, 08:59:38 AM
oh maybe so that sounds resonable


Title: Re: Polaris gets fined
Post by: Nos Prairie on January 13, 2005, 09:19:43 AM
 I caught a  clip on Headling news, I may be wrong it was early in the AM, instead of fined it may be fund.


Title: Re: Polaris gets fined
Post by: ripraff on January 13, 2005, 09:25:11 AM
oh ok


Title: Re: Polaris gets fined
Post by: 2k5gixxer1k on January 13, 2005, 12:13:51 PM
ATV Company to Pay Nearly $1M Settlement

ELIZABETH WOLFE

Associated Press

WASHINGTON - Polaris Industries Inc. has agreed to pay nearly $1 million to settle allegations it belatedly reported defects and hazards on some of its all-terrain vehicles, the first such penalty involving ATVs, the government announced Thursday.

The defects were linked to dozens of accidents and at least 25 injuries from December 1998 to February 2001, including burns, torn muscles, scrapes and bruises, the Consumer Product Safety Commission said.

Two separate CPSC investigations found that Polaris, based in Medina, Minn., allegedly made engineering changes to certain ATV models after receiving injury and accident reports, but before informing the government of any problems, as federal law requires.

Polaris said in a statement that it "vigorously disagrees" with the allegations and denied any wrongdoing, but that it agreed to the $950,000 settlement to avoid continuing legal costs.

In an interview, CPSC Chairman Hal Stratton said he hoped the penalty would serve as a deterrent to other companies seeking to avoid reporting substantial product hazards.

According to the commission, between December 1998 and May 2000, Polaris received 88 reports of throttles sticking in the controls of three of its ATV models - the Scrambler, Sport and Xplorer 400 - a defect that can prevent the machines from slowing or stopping.

Seven injuries were reported, including a dislocated hip and a broken shoulder. After three engineering changes, the company reported the problems in May 2000, prompting a recall that August, CPSC said.

The second case involved Xpedition, Trail Boss and Magnum 325 models, which had oil lines that blew off, disconnected or loosened, resulting in spraying of hot, pressurized oil, CPSC said. Between March 1999 and February 2001, the company received nearly 1,450 reports of such accidents, including 42 fires and 18 injuries. As before, Polaris allegedly made engineering changes before reporting problems to the CPSC, and eventually announced a recall.

The CPSC has been criticized for dragging its feet on monitoring the ATV industry. While sales of the vehicles - designed to travel over dirt, rocks and trails - are in the hundreds of thousands and increasing annually, consumer and health advocates doubt their safety for children under 16 and have urged the government to regulate sales to younger riders.

The commission has reported more than 5,000 ATV-related deaths since 1982, with children under 16 accounting for about a third. Stratton said new 2003 data would be released this month.

"We are facing an epidemic in the country and we need the CPSC to show strong and effective leadership, and that has not happened yet," said Rachel Weintraub, assistant general counsel for Consumer Federation of America.

The federation and several other consumer and physician groups filed a petition in 2002 asking the CPSC to make it illegal to sell adult-sized ATVs intended for children. Stratton said he hopes to respond to the petition soon, but could not give a timeframe.

Without revealing how the commission might rule, Stratton said: "We can pass a regulation that said that. Now, whether we can enforce a regulation like that is a whole different kettle of fish."

In the interview Wednesday, he addressed the broader issue of safety measures riders can take to avoid accidents, including wearing a helmet, riding solo on one-seater vehicles and staying off pavement.


Title: Re: Polaris gets fined
Post by: Toomey on January 13, 2005, 03:42:21 PM
-------"We are facing an epidemic in the country and we need the CPSC to show strong and effective leadership, and that has not happened yet," said Rachel Weintraub.------


Wow, she makes it sounds like quads are a deadly sickness that is spreading or something.  ::)


Title: Re: Polaris gets fined
Post by: VelociRaptor350 on January 13, 2005, 04:51:43 PM
That must suck, having an oil line pop off and burning the crap out of your leg, hell i'd sue them too. The problem is they are going to turn this from one company to all, and then start with the atv bashing, this is just more fuel for the fire.


Title: Re: Polaris gets fined
Post by: bbf on January 13, 2005, 05:47:56 PM
this is a first for any orv company to get sued


Title: Re: Polaris gets fined
Post by: SCRAMBLERX on January 14, 2005, 07:14:54 AM
throttle sticking?? thought i had a heavy foot.


Title: Re: Polaris gets fined
Post by: dookie on February 01, 2005, 09:48:25 AM
Quote
this is a first for any orv company to get sued


no it isnt why do you think there arent any 3 wheelers being made


Title: Re: Polaris gets fined
Post by: Flea_Jumper on February 01, 2005, 07:25:56 PM
If Polaris got fined for hot oil burning people, than Yamaha is next.  The YFZ has a defective compression plug that lets oil pour out and I even read that it has caused some fires.


Title: Re: Polaris gets fined
Post by: VelociRaptor350 on February 01, 2005, 08:03:44 PM
The defect isn't the reason they are getting fined, its they way they handled it.  The tried to fix the problem before letting the goverment know, and thats aganist the law.